|
As an
American, I often marvel at the tremendous evolution of
the United States. In a matter of a couple of centuries
(baby years, as it pertains to nations), the United
States has gone from a band of rebellious colonies in an
untamed frontier to the world’s leading economic and
military superpower! Our advances in medicine and
technology over the past century set a benchmark for
other nations. How, some may ask, did this happen?
What did the United States possess to facilitate such a
rapid transformation? The answer appears in our
infancy, and was validated in the nineteenth century by
a Frenchman named Alexis de Tocqueville. While doffing
his hat to American greatness, he also gave us a
warning. I fear that this warning has gone unheeded,
and threatens the fabric of this great nation. What
happens now is up to us.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
The founders
of America were lovers of God and liberty. The
influence of religious faith, particularly Christian
faith, cannot be overstated as it pertains to our
founding fathers and the system of government they set
in motion. Some historical revisionists would have us
believe that the majority of the founders were, at most,
deists. Yet this view is not borne out in their
speeches and writings, both public and private. A
unique piety characterizes our founding fathers. I say
“unique”, because their faith was so much a part of who
they were. It affected their worldview. In a recent
Presidential debate, President Bush responded to a
question about his faith by stating, “I never want to
impose my religion on anybody else. But when I make
decisions, I stand on principle, and the principles are
derived from who I am…. I believe that God wants
everybody to be free. That's what I believe.” I was
struck because, while lacking some of the eloquence,
President Bush submitted a view that echoed what so many
of our founders said.
In his
inaugural address on March 4, 1809, President James
Madison said, “We have all been encouraged to feel in
the guardianship and guidance of that Almighty Being,
whose power regulates the destiny of nation.”1
In a letter to the French ministry, Benjamin Franklin
wrote, “Whoever shall introduce into public affairs
the principles of primitive Christianity will change the
face of the world.” Alexander Hamilton opined, “You
would be convinced, that natural liberty is a gift of
the beneficent Creator, to the whole human race…”
One quote that is a particular favorite of mine comes
from Thomas Jefferson. President Jefferson is heralded
a champion of secularism, due to the revisionist
interpretation of his phrase regarding a wall of
separation between church and state. Next to my desk,
captioning a photo of the Ten Commandments monument
removed from the Alabama Supreme Court is the following
words of Thomas Jefferson, “God who gave us life gave
us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be
thought secure when we have removed their only firm
basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that
these liberties are of the Gift of God? That they are
not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I
tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just;
that His justice cannot sleep forever.” Addressing
his troops at Valley Forge, General George Washington
said, “While we are zealously performing the duties
of good citizens and soldiers, we certainly ought not to
be inattentive to the higher duties of religion. To the
distinguished character of Patriot, it should be our
highest Glory to laud the more distinguished Character
of Christian.”
While the
list of similar quotes of faith and piety among our
founding fathers goes on and on, I want to supply one
last quote, giving it its own paragraph due to its
importance. Patrick Henry was a revolutionary leader
whose most famous statement is probably, “Give me
liberty or give me death!” Yet as stirring as those
words are, Henry said something else that I consider
just as noteworthy, though much less noted. While
historical revisionists will scoff at the idea that the
foundations of our nation are unmistakably Christian,
and pander their doctrines of pluralism and moral
relativism, let these words of Patrick Henry speak down
through the years, “It cannot be emphasized to
strongly or too often that this great nation was
founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on
religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this
very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded
asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.”
Here it is spelled out. The secret of America’s
greatness was not in her plurality, but in her
Christianity. It is this Christianity that bred her
generosity and deference to the downtrodden. It is this
Christianity that bred a love for liberty and a love for
our fellow man.
Approximately
half a century after the United States declared her
independence, a Frenchman named Alexis de Tocqueville
traveled to the U.S. to study what made America great.
A critic of the political instability in Europe, de
Tocqueville saw in the U.S. an opportunity to find a key
with which to unlock the stifled potential in Europe.
He published his findings in a two-part work called,
Democracy in America. I’d like to share a
few of de Tocqueville’s observations:
“The Americans combine the
notions of Christianity and of liberty so intimately in
their minds, that it is impossible to make them conceive
the one without the other.”
“In France I had almost always
seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom
marching in opposite directions. But in America I found
they were intimately united and that they reigned in
common over the same country.”
“I
sought for the key to the greatness and genius of
America in her harbors…; in her fertile fields and
boundless forests; in her rich mines and vast world
commerce; in her public school system and institutions
of learning. I sought for it in her democratic
Congress and in her matchless Constitution. Not until
I went into the churches of America and heard her
pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the
secret of her genius and power.”
The last quote above is key. The
source of America’s greatness was not found in our
government, technology, or natural resources. They
source of America’s greatness was in her deep faith that
affected the worldview of her citizens. Because of the
worldview, influenced by faith, a free government and
progressive economy resulted. While I could quote many
more similar lines from de Tocqueville, I want to
include but one more. This is what I consider to be de
Tocqueville’s American prophecy:
“America
is great because America is good, and if America ever
ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”
Many of de Tocqueville’s
observations regarding the nation I call home fill me
with pride, but this last statement, seemingly
prophetic, fills me with dread. I fear that America has
been in the process of losing her “goodness” for several
decades now, and her greatness will surely be a casualty
of this moral conflict.
As we roll the clock forward since
de Tocqueville made his observations about American
culture and democracy, our nation saw quite a few highs
and lows. The dark moments of slavery, the Civil War,
two world wars, and the great depression have been
punctuated by the light of emancipation, combat
victories, national expansion, and technological
advances. As we faced the global evil of communism, we
led the world in fighting this evil. While our “big
stick” kept communist expansion in check, we cared for
the oppressed around the world. Even our military might
was used to feed the hungry, as in the Berlin Airlift.
As the tiny nation of Israel declared her independence
in the bees’ nest of the predominantly Muslim
Middle-East, we stood by her.
Starting in the 1960’s, a new
enemy emerged, clothed in black robes. Activist judges
began moving their agenda of hostility toward free
Christian expression. Through a mistaken interpretation
of Jefferson’s “wall of separation” statement, and a
misapplication of America’s first civil rights law – the
Fourteenth Amendment – judges began attacking prayer in
school, displays of the Ten Commandments, and other
forms of free religious expression. The judicial branch
of government suddenly took on the duties of the
legislative, and began dictating an anti-religious
worldview. Ironically, the separationists’ ad hoc hero
in this battle, Thomas Jefferson, was wary of just such
judicial activism. Frustrated Jefferson wrote, “The
Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the
judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form
they please.” This isn’t how Jefferson envisioned
the judicial branch operating. Instead, as he opined in
a letter to Justice William Johnson in 1823, Jefferson
said,
“On
every question of construction, carry ourselves back
to the time when the Constitution was adopted,
recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and
instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of
the text, or invented against it, conform to the
probable one in which it was passed.”
On another
occasion, Jefferson wrote to William Jarvis:
“You seem…to consider the
judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional
questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one
which would place us under the despotism of an
oligarchy…. The Constitution has erected no such single
tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with
corruptions of time and party, its members would become
despots.”
It could be
argued that this is Jefferson’s American prophecy, for
indeed, this is what has occurred. The legislature is
powerless to enact the will of the people when the
courts are ready to declare the will of the people
“unconstitutional.” I provide the following two
examples. The Defense of Marriage Act carried
overwhelming public support according to public opinion
polls, and was passed by a wide margin in the congress
and signed into law by President Clinton. Yet now,
judges are declaring the Act unconstitutional in various
cases. The only way to prevent this well supported Act
from dying a judicial death is to pass an amendment to
the U.S. Constitution to make that law constitutional.
In another example, the public overwhelmingly supported
the ban on partial birth abortion. This ban also
readily passed through the legislature and was signed
into law by President George W. Bush. Yet judges across
this nation are ruling the law unconstitutional, as it
does not provide for the health of the mother. In so
doing, the judges are disregarding public pronouncements
by the American Medical Association which state that the
primary concern for the health of the mother is in
performing partial birth abortions, not in withholding
them. On these matters and others involving moral
social issues, the will of the majority of Americans is
overruled by activist judges who seem to prefer the job
of congressman.
This brings
me to the issue of a biblical worldview. Essentially, a
worldview is a person’s set of beliefs on a variety of
social and political issues. A “biblical worldview”
means that a person’s beliefs on social and political
issues are effected by their belief in the authority of
the Bible. For instance, if a person believes that God
created each of us specially within our mothers’ womb
(Psalm 22:10, 139:13), then that person is more likely
to hold sacred the life of the unborn, and oppose
abortion. If I believe that homosexuality is a sin, as
clearly defined in both the Old and New Testament of the
Bible, then I am not likely to support government
recognition of gay marriage or homosexual advocacy in
high school sex education curricula. If I believe that
the Bible instructs the church to care for those in
need, then I will probably be a strong supporter of
faith-based initiatives.
President
Bush has been criticized extensively for stating that he
prays for guidance, and for espousing a Christian
worldview. In the third presidential debate of 2004,
Bob Schieffer asked President Bush what role faith plays
in his policy decisions. President Bush answered, “First,
my faith plays a lot -- a big part in my life. And
that's, when I was answering that question, what I was
really saying to the person was that I pray a lot. And I
do. And my faith is a very -- it's very personal. I
pray for strength. I pray for wisdom. I pray for our
troops in harm's way. I pray for my family. I pray for
my little girls…. Prayer and religion sustain me. I
receive calmness in the storms of the presidency….
Religion is an important part. I never want to impose my
religion on anybody else. But when I make decisions, I
stand on principle, and the principles are derived from
who I am. I believe we ought to love our neighbor like
we love ourself, as manifested in public policy through
the faith-based initiative where we've unleashed the
armies of compassion to help heal people who hurt. I
believe that God wants everybody to be free. That's what
I believe. And that's been part of my foreign policy.
In Afghanistan, I believe that the freedom there is a
gift from the Almighty. And I can't tell you how
encouraged I am to see freedom on the march. And so my
principles that I make decisions on are a part of me,
and religion is a part of me.”
Senator John
Kerry, the Democrat candidate for President has a
different opinion. He has a worldview, that much is
certain, but he believes it is wrong for religious
beliefs to influence that worldview. In a Democrat
debate in January of this year, Senator Kerry said, “But
I have always separated
[religion] from public
life. I've always viewed that as critical. I think I am
who I am. My entire person is affected by my belief
structure, by the values given to me both through my
parents and through religion, but I don't make decisions
in public life based on religious belief, nor do I think
we should. I think that there is a separation of church
and state, and whatever the doctrine of your state is
has to guide you, but you don't make it based on that.”
Every two years, we are faced
with important decisions – electing future leaders to
public office. Every four years, these decisions
include the office of President of the world’s leading
superpower. The question we as Christians must ask is
this: which candidate has the worldview that I consider
important? Is it the Christian worldview shared by a
majority of our nations founders – the worldview that so
impressed de Tocqueville? Or is it a secular worldview
that promises to continue the moral decline we’ve seen
over the past forty years? Over the last half century,
the Democratic Party has become distanced from a
biblical worldview. Support for gay marriage, humanist
and homosexual indoctrination of our public school
children, and abortion “rights” are platform issues that
separate the Democratic Party from the teachings and
values of Scripture. If we want to fend off the
fulfillment of de Tocqueville’s prediction, we must
develop a biblical worldview and put that worldview into
action by voting for those candidates who most closely
share that worldview. In doing so, we pay heed to 2
Chronicles 7:14, “if
my people, who are called by my name, will humble
themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their
wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will
forgive their sin and will heal their land.”
Professing and practicing a biblical worldview is not
the same as seeking to establish a theocracy. We will
live in the perfect theocracy soon enough, when our
Savior returns as King. Until then, we are obligated to
live our faith in every aspect of our lives.
Some
Christians view political involvement as a detestable
involvement in “earthly things”. They feel we should
rise above this fray, and give credence to the
secularists’ misapplied “separation of church and
state.” I submit that we must put our faith into action
by electing leaders who will seek out God’s blessings
for our nation, and appoint justices who won’t legislate
a secular worldview from the bench. We cannot afford
further moral decay. We must be as committed to a
Christian worldview as were our nation’s founders. Only
then can our nation be “good” and cling to greatness.
*For a summary of where Senator
Kerry and President Bush stand on various issues of
importance to a Christian worldview, please check out
our Presidential Voter Guide here:
http://www.contenderministries.org/2004voterguide.php
1.
Citations for
all quotations are available upon request.
|